• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
The Digital Home of Dennis A. Smith

The Digital Home of Dennis A. Smith

NZ-based Private Investigative Author & Blogger

  • Home
  • About
    • First Time Visitors
    • Biography
    • Called Out
    • Conspiracy
    • Disclosure Statement
  • Posts
    • All Posts
    • Featured
    • Book Reviews
    • Money, Currencies
    • Latest Musings
      • Latest Musings
    • Short Stories
    • The Samoa Files
  • Books
    • All Books Listed
    • Deception – The MH370 & MH17 Stories
    • EVIL UNMASKED!! Understanding Widespread Systemic Satanic Pedophilia
    • I Fed the BABY
    • MESSY! The Caroline Macdonald Backstory
    • Mistakes of the Monetary Reformers
    • The BBX Investigation
    • The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!!
    • The Secret Life of A Private Investigator
    • US Election Fraud UNMASKED!!
  • Contact
    • BBX Feedback

Crooked Cops UNMASKED!! NZ Abandonment Laws

12 August, 2021 by dennis 3 Comments

This post explains the New Zealand law in relation to abandonment as best as I can establish. It relates to a scrap between a local builder Josh Hawkless and myself. Basically a new tenant next door gave the disputed scrap steel to me when he moved in. He wanted the section cleared and I asked him for it. I thought that Josh had abandoned it but four months later Josh turned up and said, “That’s mine and I’m going to take it – now!” which if you know me, went down like a ton of lead bricks. Yours truly said, “Yeah, Nah!” A ‘crooked’ cop then got involved, hooked the gear out while I wasn’t there and the rest is history. Enjoy!

There’s not much around relating to NZ abandonment laws but in 1958 a Supreme Court Judge used a 1936 ruling to rule that goods can be abandoned even if the value later changes.

The matters got a little crazy with the local cops getting involved, acting in bad faith, breaking in while I wasn’t there and securing the disputed goods by way of a ‘dodgy’ Search Warrant – obviously done for their mate. All pretty marginal stuff if you ask me but hey, I’m not a lawyer, I’m just a dude with an opinion!

I’ve shared this previously and how this dispute will go to both civil and criminal courts for resolution. Josh doesn’t want to talk about it man-to-man. That’s what spoiled little rich kids do of course. Run and hide and stomp their feet and cry to their daddy for help rather than to man-up. Josh is one of those, apparently!

Abandonment

In 2019, Josh Hawkless entered into a contract with Colliers International to demolish a neighbouring building. He was paid and upon completion of the contract had apparently abandoned any interest in all the remaining goods. They were picked over, for a while then stayed there for more than a year. I still asked Josh for his permission to remove the scrap steel (which was denied and his wishes respected).

When the new tenant took possession of the property though, I assumed that the rights to any remaining goods (like the scrap steel) had reverted to the new lessee. I wasn’t party to the new lease – I’m just a neighbour – but the new lessee also assumed that he had inherited a legitimate interest in the scrap steel as it fell upon him to dispose of the goods. So two people therefore, independently determined that the goods had been abandoned and that title to the goods vested in the new tenant when he took over the lease. Reasonable? I would think so!

Anyway, a court will eventually determine who legitimately owns the steel and the adjudicator will need to determine on the facts and the law who owns the disputed goods. They will also need to determine what the value of the goods are.

Discussion

Time periods and intentions are important with abandonment.

Abandonment usually requires a specific act of abandonment to occur, such as dumping, or actively relinquishing an interest or right to something or a title or similar. You can’t for example just take a Mercedes with a flat tyre or even if it is involved in an accident from the side of the road and say, “It’s mine!” just because its owner went away from it. If he said though, “OK you can have it if you pick up the pieces!” then sure, that is an intent of abandonment.

Long timeframes though can also cause abandonment to occur. If a gazillion years passes and the original owner doesn’t care about something then the courts can determine that abandonment has occurred. Timeframe alone though does not determine whether something is legally abandoned. The courts seem to respect title even if time has passed. Civil and Criminal cases too have a marked difference in approach as civil deals with the law in regards to title – who ACTUALLY owns the disputed goods. Criminal law however defines claim of right (it used to be called, “colour of right”) as the BELIEF that abandonment has occurred or that one has a right to take, own or control something.

In my case the law is not clear as to what the requirements are in terms of abandoned property. I knew that the disputed steel was originally his. That’s why I never touched it when he said, no and sold it off to others. What was left however appeared to us for all intents and purposes to be abandoned. The Property Law Act deals with this by assuming that anything of value left behind by previous occupiers is put into storage and that storage fees are deducted from the sale price when it is then sold – usually by auction. The new tenant has the right of course (unless he has agreed specifically with the landlord otherwise) to dispose of anything deemed rubbish or of no commercial value.

In my case the new tenant was happy for me to take the scrap steel because he wanted it gone and didn’t see much commercial value to it. He did the deal of course because it was in his interest to do so. If he gave it to me then he didn’t need to take it to a scrap merchant. I had asked for it, he wanted to remain on good terms with his neighbours and all he had to do was open the gate and let me clear it out for him which I eventually did!

That Josh wanted to and did come back for it caught us all by surprise. My guess is that Josh found out that there was a new tenant some four months after he moved in and then swung by to pick it up, only to find that it was already gone. In fact I know that to be the case because the attending cop (CC1) told me that neither the landlord nor the new tenant even knew what was happening down there until Josh started the sh*t-stirring! He also made comment that only I seemed to know WTF was going on down here! Funny that eh?

Items can change value over time too. In a 1958 case quoting an older 1936 case which is used as an example in case law, a judge ruled that some hypothetical valuable mining equipment in a difficult place to extract was worthless at one time, yet later may become valuable if it could be used, repurposed or accessed for example. It is not then reasonable that the original owner can come back and say, “Oy – that’s mine!”

There may be machinery used for goldmining which is often of great value, but in a site difficult to access and so not worth the trouble of getting it out from that position. If that property were abandoned and some years later someone seeing that it was derelict found a use for it on a handy site it would seem unjust and unnecessary that the Official Assignee should have the right to be entitled to claim the property from the man who found it abandoned.

Butler v Harrison 1958 quoting Mayal v Galbraith 1936

So, in order to have a civil court determine the correct ownership of the scrap steel I will need to present my case, Josh will present his case, the adjudicator will apply the law to the best of their ability and that’s that. Josh will either need to return the scrap steel (or pay me whatever the adjudicator determines is fair if that is not possible) or else I lose and Josh and I go our merry ways – he with ‘his’ scrap steel and me with another lesson in life!

And in order to prove the case in a criminal court, the Prosecution will need to show a truckload of bad intent on my part, for example that I didn’t believe that the new tenant could give it to me, that I deceived him in some way or whatever . . . have at it guys, if that’s what you really want!

Obtaining by Deception

The specific crime I have been charged with is s240 (1)(a):

240 Obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception

(1) Every one is guilty of obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception who, by any deception and without claim of right,—

(a) obtains ownership or possession of, or control over, any property, or any privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, directly or indirectly;

In order to convict me the Prosecution will have to present their case that I

a) obtained property,
b) by deception, and
c) that I did it without claim of right.

The two important definitions are:

(2) In this section, deception means—

(a) a false representation, whether oral, documentary, or by conduct, where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and—

(i) knows that it is false in a material particular; or

(ii) is reckless as to whether it is false in a material particular; 

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/whole.html#DLM330275

and

claim of right, in relation to any act, means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/whole.html#DLM327394

Questions for the Jury

Assuming that these ‘crooked cops’ push through with this dodgy case, on the charge of Obtaining by Deception s240 of the Crimes Act, I consider the following question tree to be likely. The judge should set something like this for them to work through:

1. What were the goods the Prosecution claimed that I obtained?
→ If they are identified and quantified, then the jury should proceed. If they are unidentified or unquantified then the jury should clarify this because you cannot find somebody guilty of doing something generally – you gotta be specific. Imagine the trauma this could cause if someone ever said, “Oh I know he’s a criminal because he’s just an opinionated investigative blogger who wrote something nasty about my friend online!” Humpf! As the cops still haven’t told me what they took (naughty, naughty) and they haven’t told me the details of the charges (funny that eh?) who knows what this will all end up like. I continue . . .

2. Did I obtain the goods claimed? → If Yes, then the jury should proceed. If No, then the jury should find “Not Guilty”. Until I get more information I can’t be specific here.

3. What was the value of the goods taken – up to $500; up to $1,000; over $1,000? → If it is found to be worth over $1,000 then the jury should proceed. If not then the jury should adjust the charge accordingly. Over $1k has a maximum penalty of 7 years in jail. Precedent sets under two years imprisonment (i.e. home detention) for this sort of low-value crime. Until I know what the Prosecution claim though I’m in the dark.

4. Was there deception (as defined in the Act above)? → If Yes, then the jury should proceed. If No, then the jury should find “Not Guilty”. Obviously as one who has preached the foolishness of deception for years, I gotta be a pretty crazy hypocrite or this one has gotta be BS!

5. Did I have claim of right (as defined in the Act above)? → If No, then the jury should find “Guilty”. If Yes then the jury should find “Not Guilty”. Yeah right!

No prizes for guessing what my thinking is on all the above lunacy!

The Reality

I think that Josh Hawkless is an immature, greedy little ‘daddy’s boy’ who seems to think that the world owes him everything. [Golly, did I really say that? . . . I guess I just did!]

He drove by the neighbours place and saw that a new tenant had taken over the vacant land next door to me, and probably thought to himself, “Oh, shit! I better get that scrap steel out of there while I can!” and then sold it, sight unseen, not knowing that it had already gone. He and another dude came down to suss it out the morning that they were intending to hook it out but they found a whole bunch of firewood there where he had left all the scrap steel. He then drove away then wondered if I had taken it, so he returned to my place and found it.

He was under pressure because he had sold it so he demanded that I return it and called the Police on 111 in my presence on my land as a threat. The Police are most likely to have told him on that phone call to get off my property which he did but he parked his car deliberately in a way that I could not shut my gate. He also tried to escape from the Police station later that day without speaking to me because he knew that the Police were intending to press charges as a result of his insistence. That’s why he exited the cop shop at the rear!

Josh turned up with the Police later and took a bunch of stuff that he claimed was his, both he and the cops knowing full well that the ownership was disputed and that the dispute was already before the civil court. I think that he did this because he had sold the scrap steel and he most likely will have a big problem if the civil court determines that he should return it to me.

I think that both Josh Hawkless and Samuel Edwards from the Taumarunui Police are crooked and conspired to pre-empt the civil court hearing and have proven bad faith conduct in more than one way.

I finish this ‘rant’ with a copy of an email sent to Josh last week inviting him to resolve this dispute in a godly or Christian (or even just an honest manner would do me) and then I give a personal warning. As with all crooks, crims and crazies that I expose, they run and hide and deceive. Josh, you’re a fraud and an utter disgrace and if I was your wife or parent or anyone one close to you I’d be telling you to hang your head in shame. Any time I look at you, know full well that these sentiments are all true.

Email to Josh Hawkless

SUBJECT: Disputed goods
Wed, 28 Jul, 18:09
Dennis A Smith <victusinambitus@gmail.com>
to josh

Hi Josh
On Friday morning 16/7/2021 you visited first Kevin’s and then my lands claiming ownership of left over scrap steel from the demolition job, undertaken in December 2019.
You told me that you were going to take it that morning because you had sold it and you had a forklift coming to get it that morning. I resisted your demands, claimed that the steel was mine and invited you to return to talk about it when you had calmed down. In reply you twisted reality and said that you were not angry but that it was me inflaming the situation i.e. making the situation worse [by refusing to give in to your demands]. I recognised my rights, said “No!” then told you that I did not want a fight with you and invited you to return at another time. That sir, is godly conduct in a commercial conflict situation.
You gave me two options – acquiesce to your demands or face the alternative which you showed me when you then called the Police on 111 and moved your vehicle off my property although parked in a way that I could not close my gate. You refused to move it so that I could close it, three times pretending to walk away from me that you had not heard me. Both officers observed this interaction. You are therefore IMHO a bully and dishonest.
Despite my repeated claims that this was a civil dispute and that they should butt out of the matter, Sam from the Police informed me that they believed that a burglary had occurred; then when I proved that to be false, he claimed that that theft has occurred and that it was their intention to charge me with theft. I then initiated a civil case (CIV 2021-068-000032) which is IMHO the correct legal process for resolving civil disputes if it is not possible for two parties to resolve the matters themselves. Christians are encouraged to resolve their matters “in-house” but it appears to me that this is not your priority. I blame you and your conduct in its entirety for this disgrace. I was minding my own business. You can into my land and my life uninvited on Friday and created a scene.
That we are in a dispute situation is due, IMHO to your failure to understand reality, both morally, spiritually and legally which I will try to explain here, hopefully you or Leticia will listen-up and get it.

  1. I am a man of God. I might be a prickly rooster but when I told you that I didn’t want to fight with you, I meant it. I say what I mean and mean what I say. If at any time during this dispute process you wish to let go, get real and apologise I will respond openly and honestly. You might not get exactly what you want but at least you know that you will be dealing with an aspect of godliness – a dude who shoots straight.
  2. I have never and will never lie to you nor steal anything from you. In this regard I will remind you that you offered to pay me to help you demolish the place next door but I refused, instead taking only what you didn’t want which included a pair of unwanted workboots so that I could retire my “Samoan safety boots” and comply with OSH regulations for you. I was very careful to honour your wishes and as far as I knew nothing, I repeat nothing,  went from one section to the other without your prior knowledge and/or approval. Nothing. Anything disputed or where you changed your mind (which you did do more than once) was returned or sorted to your satisfaction without quibble. In my book you have nothing “on me” over the business that we did over those few weeks. I provided security for you, honoured you and never did anything to hurt you nor your interests – indeed to the contrary.
  3. We never had any disagreement and you received commercial value for our engagement. How much that is, or even whether that can be or should be measured in monetary concerns is not and has never been of any interest to me. You were a neighbour and I could help so I did, no money changed hands. The deal was done and I fully honoured all my commitments to you.
  4. During the year following I asked you three times for the remaining steel, and in one instance even one specific small part of it. Three times you refused me, giving me variants on the same story that you had given or sold it to a farmer who wanted it for building a barn. I understood from you that he had taken what he wanted and thus the remaining leftovers had no commercial value to you but you still did not want to give them to me. Unless it relates to gossip received from Laurie Bull or anyone associated with him I do not care why you wanted to keep it from my ownership or possession. 
  5. You told me that the fact that I asked you three times is an indication that I acknowledged that you owned the steel and this is true, but remember this works two ways, it is also evidence that three times I respected your ownership!
  6. From December 2019 until April 2021 I honoured your request totally. I did not even walk up to the steel, let alone touch any of it. Even though I had to buy new steel more than equal to what was just sitting there I never complained nor disrespected your wishes. I had asked you. You said, “No!” so that was it. I was, but am no longer a thief and consciously stopped stealing 33 years ago.
  7. You are correct when you say that this proves that I knew the steel was yours. I did and still do think that the steel was yours, up until March 2021 that is.
  8. In early march 2021 I was chatting to the new tenant Kevin who had introduced himself to me. I told him about you and that you had the PIN numbers to the padlocks, and I gave him the story about the history of the steel and he is the only one who I have told, using the exact words, “Three times”. He told me that he would phone you for access codes and in that first conversation with him I asked him for the steel and pleaded with him to leave the old oak tree as he had told me that it was his intention to cut it down and turn it into firewood.
  9. Kevin agreed and gave me access to take the steel some three or four weeks after this date.
  10. I used my forklift to take it all off his property, piece by piece in early April the same day that he unlocked the gate for me.
  11. S219 of the Crimes act requires that deception or dishonesty exists before a crime occurs. In legal terms this is known as “mens rea“, Latin for a “guilty mind”, thus no mens rea exists in relation to “your steel”. I have blogged about this recently.
  12. I believe and believed that both in March 2021 when he authorised the collection of your old steel from his property AND in April 2021 when he opened the gate so that I could move it, that both he and I acted legally and morally correctly. At that point he had legal title to anything left behind on the property and thus title to those goods transferred to him when he took over title of the land. At that point you abandoned those goods to him. You cannot morally nor legally come back onto land and claim legal right to something four months after the new tenant has disposed of them, sorry. What would you have done if he had sold them for scrap, and they were out of Taumarunui? Sued him? Called the cops on him?
  13. The law gives guidelines for the treatment of abandoned goods in the event of leases but you never leased land from Colliers or Linz. Kevin has/did. Under the PLA, basically with abandoned goods, a new tenant can do anything reasonable in the circumstances – either store the goods, dispose of them by way of sale or discard them. Special rules apply to perishables and any overtly malicious action could become questionable and cost recovery is also an option. 
  14. Did you get confirmation from the new lessee that the left over steel was yours and offer to pay him to store it there? No you didn’t, and the truth will become known eventually to those who want to know it.
  15. Are you aware of the situation that you have created now between two neighbours down here with your insistence that you own that steel? Have you even thought of the stress and pain you have created for Kevin? WTF was he to do with something you left behind? All he wanted to do was to be friends with his neighbours, and clear his land not get one of them arrested and potentially putting himself in the gun too?
  16. IMHO in the matter of “your steel” I believe that Kevin’s decision to gift the steel to me was perfectly reasonable given the circumstances:
    a) He had legitimate title to the land;
    b) He knew the history of the scrap steel from talking to me;
    c) He had spoken to you by phone to get the access codes and you had not mentioned it to him;
    d) I asked for it and obviously would use it:
    e) It had low, or certainly questionable commercial value;  
    f) I had offered to remove it for him at no cost from a property that he was in the process of clearing for its new use. This presented him with a pragmatic solution by solving his immediate problem AND keeping a good relationship with his neighbour; and
    g) He has no agreement with his landlord to hold or protect your interests in any ‘abandoned’ steel.
  17. This analysis of events makes even more sense when it is done at the end of July 2021, 20 months after your demolition contract was finished when you came onto my property and claimed colour of right!
  18. You may or may not like hearing this Josh, and I don’t care what BS you have heard about me by way of gossip around town nor why you felt like you could come in here and try to muscle your ownership of some scrap steel you left behind for nigh on two years but unless the adjudicator finds to the contrary I believe that you were wrong to do what you did legally – most certainly morally too.
  19. You have now caused me gross offence and it is you who have directly caused difficulties for others with your actions.
  20. Specifically you have potentially caused me difficulties in renewing my lease with Colliers in Wellington with your contacting them and securing their verification that you own the steel. It’s none of their business! Even simply asking them for proof that it was yours has created a perception that I am trouble. That’s not fair, especially in the circumstances, and if there is any adverse consequence as a result of your unwise actions then I will hold you personally accountable. Think VERY carefully Josh about this. Club Wairua has two and a half acres in Matapuna and I have invested into the buildings substantially for more than a couple of years now. If this issue is not resolved to my satisfaction and if any future adversity can be tracked back to any Collier’s bad attitude towards me as a result of your words or actions, then expect me to knock on your door and hold you personally liable.
  21. Specifically you have laid a complaint to the Police via a 111 call when standing in front of me on my property when there was no danger to life or property. This is not the mark of good-faith conduct Josh. It is the mark of a spoiled little brat that didn’t get his way and attempted to tell on another to the authorities to either get back at someone who has embarrassed you and or refused you to get what you want. It is not your right Josh to store stuff on other people’s land then to complain about a neighbour whom the stuff has been given to yonks ago. Yes, you owned those goods right up until the day that Kevin signed his lease and/or took possession legally but you have no rights to those goods now, Josh – none! I know that. Kevin knew that perfectly well and Sam should have known it too from the outset if he had an open mind. Whatever. The pending civil case will sort it out if you don’t do so before the hearing.
  22. Your collection of goods that you claim that you own has also been aggressive and immoral, possibly illegal in the circumstances. Prepare for an escalation of these matters.
  23. Your words and actions have also caused pressure to be applied onto the Police so that their conduct in forcing the issue has raised questions of trust for more than just me. Be prepared to take the consequences of full exposure Josh.
  24. On 18 July 2021 I paid $45.00 to obtain adjudication once and for all over who owns this steel. I have told the Police more than once in writing and verbally that this is a civil matter and I have explained why it is. Lodging a civil case like this and informing the Police before their charging mew shows bad faith conduct and especially so if the adjudicator says that Kevin and I did the honourable and legal thing, which is what I expect.
  25. You should also know by now that I am a … Private Investigative Blogger and Author, fearless to speak it as I find it. If you fail to respond to this communication constructively or if you persist in causing me or those associated with me (like Colliers or Kevin) or indeed anyone in the Taumarunui/King Country region (especially those in the Christian community) any more difficulty then you should expect to receive a reaction in defence. 
  26. The correct way to dealing with a wrong is to face up to the one who is challenging you man-to-man. I ask you why you can not do this, and why you wish to avoid me now. What are you going to do when I arrive in your church, sit beside you and your family, lift my hands and start praising Jesus for His goodness and love towards us all? What do you expect Leticia to say or do to me when I meet her in the street? Snub me or argue with me like you have? What do you want me to tell my grandkids about you when they start playing with your kids when they visit Taumarunui? How do you want me to talk about you to others in your church – that you’re acting like a spoilt little daddy’s boy who stomps his feet and says, it’s mine? To your parents? To strangers in the street?
  27. Sin takes us further. lasts longer and costs a lot more than we ever think possible when we engage it. Your mistake was first to demand the steel when I said, “No!” and it was made worse when you phoned 111 from my property, then parking your car off my property then in a way that I cannot close the gate and pretending not to hear my request for you to move it. Brudda, this is a far cry from godly conduct. Trust me, if you don’t repent and turn away from this stupidity your pride will only take you down and down and down . . . to death.
  28. Own it Josh, or the escalation will cost us all dearly.   

Now let me ask you, my readers, “How would you respond to receiving something like this?”

I’d be livid. I’d be seething with rage that somebody would dare to preach at me like this and to try to call me out like this. I mean FFS calling me a spoiled little brat? How can this dude even think of calling me that? Then I would sleep on it and wonder why my wife was up all night, praying for me, and why she had tears in her eyes, and why she was fearful of talking to me the next morning.

And then, depending on how much I trusted her judgment and how close I was to her, I might dare to ask her what she really thought. And if she was a good girl and knew what I was saying was right and that her husband was indeed all that I claimed, and probably more, I’d do the honourable thing, fess up and apologize.

In Samoa I watched as the people around me attempted to rip me off, steal from me and cause me a whole bunch of trouble needlessly, but I also observed the hand of the Lord, reaching out and touching me and people around me and encouraging them to do the honourable thing. I also watched at the impact of my words, and actions, sometimes even just my presence as people, even animals, were dealt to lovingly by Him.

Yes, more than once I had people coming to me shocked that unexplained death occurred in families who had crossed me. One family from Savaii I clearly recall did something bad and their Matai and his grandson both died on the same day in the same hospital less than a month later. The locals know that they did wrong by me and they believe that this was God’s punishment on that family. I don’t know but I do remember pointing my finger at this dude’s nose and telling him off, so it could have easily had the same effect as a witch-doctor pointing a bone at some poor villager. I now don’t have that man as a father in law and that family has lost way more than opportunity and a couple of males.

I’ve watched dogs run and charge at me only to turn into ‘friendly angels’ who licked my hands in the space of only seconds as they got closer, and situations in numbers beyond recall where the people watched miracles around me as I did things or said things that they expected war or death to result from, but it didn’t. Likewise it is no surprise to me that crooks like their then Prime Minister came down somewhat as a direct result of what I have said.

Look, it is not that I can control God, or that I want to or can put people to death nor is it that I’m better than everyone else. It is that (as I have tried to explain to this young man above) I shoot straight – always and if you’re going to cross me, rip me off or do ill to me, expect a reaction – from me and also the Lord who always protects his own.

Is the hair on the back of your neck still up a little? It should be if it isn’t. Thanks for reading this today though.

Crooked Cops UNMASKED!!

  1. Mens Rea
  2. I Just Want My Steel
  3. Josh Hawkless & The Moral, Civil & Criminal Laws
  4. NZ Abandonment Laws
  5. Acquitted: A Long Awaited Court Win
  6. Dodgy Crown Solicitors
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Crooked Cops UNMASKED!! Tagged With: crooked cops

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. NZ Legal System – It’s Not Broken says:
    6 November, 2021 at 11:05 am

    […] Taumarunui policeman Sam Edwards seems to have managed to achieve this . . . smart man [sarcasm]. They say that fools rush in where […]

    Reply
  2. The ‘Unrecognisable’, Depression & Realism says:
    28 November, 2021 at 11:46 am

    […] others whom they see as weaker than them. I’ve shared this in my life with a Crooked Cop Samuel Edwards pinging me for taking some scrap steel [supposedly] under false pretenses, despite the fact that […]

    Reply
  3. Crooked Cops – Acquitted: A Long Awaited Court Win says:
    11 January, 2022 at 9:58 am

    […] Latin phrase for a guilty mind] when a crime is committed; describing the laws in New Zealand for abandonment [you simply can’t come back to something of value after it has been abandoned and legally […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Posts by Months

Posts by Categories

Want the Latest Musings?

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Closes
  • Memories from 50 years ago!
  • More from Karen Ngatai: Taumarunui’s Non-lawyer
  • Ngati Haua Signs Up
  • Understanding [Maori] Sovereignty
  • Life Cycle of a Barter Exchange
  • One in Eleven Million
  • BBX Update 5 October 2022
  • Treasuring British Traditions – A Cultural Difference
  • Understanding the True Nature of Money
  • Meurant, Booth & de Sturler on the Crewes
  • Suicide – Sick & Tired: of Pain
  • RIP: Declan Curran, September 2022
  • MESSY! 8.Authorities: Upping the Ante
  • MESSY! 7.Getting Hidden Help
  • MESSY! 6.Dealing With the Devil
  • MESSY! 5.Analysing the Conflict
  • MESSY! 4.IRTA’s 2022 Shame
  • MESSY! 3. The Blackmail Conversation
  • MESSY! 2. The REAL Caroline Macdonald
  • MESSY! 1. Introduction
  • 38. The BBX Investigation Final Comments
  • 37. BBX Whistleblower: Cameron McKean
  • 36. MEDIA RELEASE: Barter Tax Avoidance Warning
  • 35. BBX Rips Open the Barter Industry
  • 34. BBX Devaluation Helps With Tax Losses
  • 33. Warning to BBX Staff & Associates
  • 32. BBX and Issues of Morality
  • 31. BBX Members React – It’s War
  • 30. The Raw BBX Data

Footer

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!!

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!!

This series covers the Crewe Murders and prepares for the release of the book 'I Fed the Baby' by the late John Ingley. John's book identifies the … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!!

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Hutton, Head of the Snake

In this post I share the human dynamics involved in the crooked policing surrounding the Crewe murders of 1970. I bring an understanding of human … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Hutton, Head of the Snake

UNMASKING Old English Wealth

In this post I dig into the challenge of establishing the facts behind the "Old English Wealth" that led to Maisie Demler's extreme (and largely … [Read More...] about UNMASKING Old English Wealth

Understanding Endemic Corruption

I describe here how Corruption works to the highest levels in more than one sector then apply this understanding in the case of the Crewe Murders … [Read More...] about Understanding Endemic Corruption

The 2014 Crewe Investigation Review

This is a partial discussion of the NZ Police Review, released in 2014 into the investigation of the Crewe murders in and following 1970. The Police … [Read More...] about The 2014 Crewe Investigation Review

Rochelle Crewe – Many Questions

While the primary questions asked of Rochelle Crewe are who fed her and who killed Harvey & Jeannette, her parents, John has raised more questions … [Read More...] about Rochelle Crewe – Many Questions

UNMASKING the Crewe Murders: Let’s Go!

Fifty years ago today, New Zealand's most talked about Cold Case murders occurred at Pukekawa, in South Auckland, when Harvey & Jeannette Crewe … [Read More...] about UNMASKING the Crewe Murders: Let’s Go!

Len Demler, Behind the Scenes

This post gives my take on the man that both John Ingley and I believe arranged for the murder of his daughter and son in law, Jeannette & Harvey … [Read More...] about Len Demler, Behind the Scenes

Understanding the Crime Scene

In this post I get into the nitty gritty of the Crewe murders crime scene. I assume that readers have a basic understanding of the case, suggesting … [Read More...] about Understanding the Crime Scene

A Dead Man Switch, Risk & Personal

This post gives the backstory to the publication of John Ingley's book, I Fed the Baby, and it shares the personal protection mechanisms I have put in … [Read More...] about A Dead Man Switch, Risk & Personal

To the NZ Police – Over & Out

On Friday 12 June 2020, I met with the Police officer in charge of the local Taumarunui Police Station, Paul Dowie, and this post contains a copy of … [Read More...] about To the NZ Police – Over & Out

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Cover-up

This post shares progress with the writing of my book The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! which shows the significance of events not yet talked about in … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Cover-up

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! A Summary

This post goes through the events from the outset giving a brief summary of my take, who did & said what and why. Each aspect has been dealt with … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! A Summary

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Epilogue

I conclude this book and series of posts with a big, big-picture based on the Christian world-view. The Crewe Murders have generated a huge amount of … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Epilogue

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Foreword

This book is designed to explain. My objective is for the reader to come away from reading it more sober . . . wiser . . . perhaps even a little more … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Foreword

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Keeping Secrets

This post continues a series explaining the how, what, why & who of the Crewe Murders in 1970. In previous posts I have cautioned readers … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Keeping Secrets

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Whodunnit?

Having warned of the danger of assumptions; having explained how Len Demler's Autism explains his otherwise weird and hitherto un-explainable … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Whodunnit?

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Len’s Autism

This post continues a series in which I give a big-picture account exposing the events surrounding the murder of Harvey & Jeannette Crewe in … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Len’s Autism

Ross Meurant Responds

I share here a response from Ross Meurant received this morning with a little intertwined comment, as it deserves to stand for what it is, variously … [Read More...] about Ross Meurant Responds

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Exposing Secrets

In a previous post I shared how the keeping of secrets is used by manipulators and deceivers. Fear is a common power system used to control others. … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Exposing Secrets

The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Invalid Assumptions

Assumptions can be dangerous, and many have made assumptions that may be invalid in regards to the Crewe Murders. Do you think that all within the … [Read More...] about The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Invalid Assumptions

Yusufa (Tom) Faye

Tom Faye – Dodgy Is As Dodgy Does

In this post I share a communication from an informant reporting that self-proclaimed bottom-end property developer Yusufa (Tom) Faye is ‘still’ as dodgy as they come. I also include supporting comment from others around town that have suggested less than satisfactory work standards are his style, thus the saying that leopards never change their spots […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Fools In a Hole Make It Worse by Digging!

This post is a public reply to a multi-faceted communication from an idiot businessman by the name of Yusufa (Tom) Faye, one that a mate of mine has been suing for an unpaid business debt, quite successfully too it seems! It’s a lesson in what NOT to do when you’re in a hole in business. […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tom Faye’s a Crook & a Fool!

Crooked property investor and developer Yusufa (Tom) Faye thinks he is a big-shot businessman, but he’s actually an immature lowlife crook and a fool. In a recent coup for justice he was forced to cough up what he owed. Indeed under threat of liquidation he did, he but threw a paddy at having to pay […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Idiots & Optimists in Business: Tom Faye

I share here the details of a commercial contract I’ve just completed to get funds out of am Auckland based crook – a shonky ultra low-level property developer from Kenya who calls himself Tom Faye, who came across to NZ in 2008, did a couple of years down at Otago, now lives in Auckland, jetsets […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

US Election Fraud UNMASKED!!

US Election Fraud UNMASKED!! – Introduction

This is an introduction to a book containing a series of posts that explain events surrounding the 2020 US Presidential … [Read More...] about US Election Fraud UNMASKED!! – Introduction

1. Who’re Ya Voting For?

A 'new' mate asked me this recently. According to common wisdom you shouldn't talk about politics or religion. The short … [Read More...] about 1. Who’re Ya Voting For?

2. Faith in Political Power

I dive in here deeper explaining the spiritual significance of voting, enhancing previous posts that have identified a … [Read More...] about 2. Faith in Political Power

3. Putting American Politics Into Context

I share here what I believe is an important missing component to the 2020 US Presidential Election controversy, raising … [Read More...] about 3. Putting American Politics Into Context

4. Widespread Recognition of US Presidential Election Fraud Excites Me

In a recent post I explained how my understanding of fraud in the 2020 US Presidential Elections was best seen in proper … [Read More...] about 4. Widespread Recognition of US Presidential Election Fraud Excites Me

5. Debunking Conspiracy Denial

In this post I debunk Conspiracy Denial, using as an example a recent post by a [Christian] blogger whom I deeply … [Read More...] about 5. Debunking Conspiracy Denial

6. Awakening the People

In this post I share the entire transcript of an interview between political commentator & activist Stephen K. … [Read More...] about 6. Awakening the People

7. Book Reviews: The Immaculate Deception & The Art of the Steal

My summary of these two books/reports by Whitehouse employee Peter Navarro follows. The first report (The Immaculate … [Read More...] about 7. Book Reviews: The Immaculate Deception & The Art of the Steal

8. The Error of Binary Thinking

Binary Thinking is a natural temptation but except for the one issue of salvation, the concept of good/bad is a trap and … [Read More...] about 8. The Error of Binary Thinking

9. Explaining Conspiracy In the 2020 US Elections

In previous posts I have shared aspects of my analysis of the 2020 US Presidential Elections. I continue my analysis … [Read More...] about 9. Explaining Conspiracy In the 2020 US Elections

10. Political Complexities Muddy the ‘Binary’ Waters

Viewing complex issues in a binary manner may suit Hollywood Westerns but is unwise when talking of complex political … [Read More...] about 10. Political Complexities Muddy the ‘Binary’ Waters

11. Analysing Military-based Conspiracy Information

Divining truth requires an understanding of the background of an 'information source'. In this post I share some fringe … [Read More...] about 11. Analysing Military-based Conspiracy Information

12. A Big Picture Look at Conspiracy

In this post I explain how Conspiracy can be best viewed by understanding the big picture - of how players 'play the … [Read More...] about 12. A Big Picture Look at Conspiracy

13. Logic & Experience Support US Conspiracy

The USA is currently divided over their recent Presidential Elections, with an increasing number of the population … [Read More...] about 13. Logic & Experience Support US Conspiracy

14. The Politics of [US] Corruption/Conspiracy

This post is part of a series in which I am sharing my understanding of Conspiracy, analysing particularly the huge … [Read More...] about 14. The Politics of [US] Corruption/Conspiracy

15. Book Reviews: Pedophilia & Empire: Satan, Sodomy, & the Deep State

I've previously explained that sex was an essential component of the original sin and that a major part of evil is to … [Read More...] about 15. Book Reviews: Pedophilia & Empire: Satan, Sodomy, & the Deep State

16. How Evil Works – US Election Conspiracy

This post explains how evil works in regards to the 2020 US Presidential Elections and the upcoming Inauguration of Joe … [Read More...] about 16. How Evil Works – US Election Conspiracy

17. Wisdom Applied to the US Election Conspiracy

This post is one of a series relating to the 2020 US Presidential Elections. I attempt here to apply wisdom, which I … [Read More...] about 17. Wisdom Applied to the US Election Conspiracy

18. Hope From US Election Conspiracy

In this post I explain where and why there is hope following acceptance that a Conspiracy (like the ones surrounding the … [Read More...] about 18. Hope From US Election Conspiracy

19. Cultism, New Age, False Prophets & Truth in US Election Fraud

In this post I detail the essence of Cultism, describe how New Age thinking and false prophets can be determined in … [Read More...] about 19. Cultism, New Age, False Prophets & Truth in US Election Fraud

20. The Danger of Advanced Knowledge in Truthseeking

In this post I caution against the trap of accepting the New Age concept of "advanced knowledge" and/or accepting that … [Read More...] about 20. The Danger of Advanced Knowledge in Truthseeking

21. We The People vs Deception & the 1871 Theft

Theft of "the USA" by the Deep State occurred in 1871, not just in 2020. In this post I share my take on the Sovereign … [Read More...] about 21. We The People vs Deception & the 1871 Theft

22. We’re in a War

In the previous post in this series General Flynn explained that we are in a War. One of the most important steps in … [Read More...] about 22. We’re in a War

23. Epilogue – The Truth

Exposing the truth surrounding the US Election Fraud opens the door to understanding more than just geo-politics; it … [Read More...] about 23. Epilogue – The Truth

Evil UNMASKED!!

EVIL UNMASKED!! – The Generational Curse

In this post I share the way that evil manifests through the generations: father to son, and son to grandson; mother to … [Read More...] about EVIL UNMASKED!! – The Generational Curse

Evil UNMASKED!! Good Using Evil: Juan O’Savin

In the last year or so, Private Investigator Wayne Ronald Willott (P) has developed quite a large following online and … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Good Using Evil: Juan O’Savin

Evil UNMASKED!! – The Samoan Manifestation

In this post I continue my series explaining the nature of Evil and share how it manifests in the small South Pacific … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! – The Samoan Manifestation

Evil UNMASKED!! Sin Costs Us More & Takes us Further

In this post I describe the massive costs that we pay for entertaining evil. The saying within Christendom is that "Sin … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Sin Costs Us More & Takes us Further

Evil UNMASKED!! Unmasking the Evil Mind

This post (part of a series) gets down and dirty, diving into the Mind of Evil. Most human minds do not understand evil … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Unmasking the Evil Mind

Evil UNMASKED!! The Cover-Up Will Always Get You!

This post includes the text of a report issued by myself under the Writing the Wrong Ltd entity, my NZ-registered … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! The Cover-Up Will Always Get You!

Evil UNMASKED!! Exposure Ramps Up

In this post I share my commentary on world current events that appear to be managed by evil increasingly on the back … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Exposure Ramps Up

Evil UNMASKED!! Ten Truth Theses for Easter 2021

I share here, ten truth theses, established from the school of hard knocks. Enjoy! … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Ten Truth Theses for Easter 2021

Evil UNMASKED!! Advanced Information Warfare

This post discusses Advanced Information in the context of the current Information War. It explains how the New Age … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Advanced Information Warfare

Evil UNMASKED!! Aliens & the ET Thing

ET's existence is now going mainstream. The secret to understanding Aliens and indeed anything to do with ET's is to … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Aliens & the ET Thing

Evil UNMASKED!! Revenge Belies Biblical Teaching

Hillary Rodham Clinton was arrested on 2 March 2021 and charged with a multitude of crimes too long and horrendous to … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Revenge Belies Biblical Teaching

Evil UNMASKED!! The Wisdom of Circumspection

The bible records a Creator God that retains some things to protect his creation from certain [evil] knowledge. In this … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! The Wisdom of Circumspection

Evil UNMASKED!! Hillary Clinton Hangs

This post shares the news that a Military tribunal at Guantanamo Bay has sentenced Hillary Clinton to hang on April 26, … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Hillary Clinton Hangs

EVIL UNMASKED!! The Depopulation Agenda

In this series I have shared aspects of how evil is manifested. A major focus of this aspect of life is death. It is the … [Read More...] about EVIL UNMASKED!! The Depopulation Agenda

Evil UNMASKED!! The Solution

Exposing and explaining evil is only a step in the right direction. Having got there, one needs to know and understand … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! The Solution

Evil UNMASKED!! Power Is Shifting

This post shares the events leading up to the 2020 US Presidential Elections in which it appears to me that there is and … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Power Is Shifting

EVIL UNMASKED!! Introduction

What follows is the Introduction to my latest book, 'EVIL UNMASKED!! Understanding Widespread Systemic Satanic … [Read More...] about EVIL UNMASKED!! Introduction

Evil UNMASKED!! Divining Truth

This post uses two stories about the arrest of Generals Milley and Hokanson on 14 April 2021 to demonstrate the process … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Divining Truth

Evil UNMASKED!! Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

Part of a series & book, this post quotes extensively from a classic by author John Perkins who self-identifies as … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

Evil UNMASKED!! The New Confessions…

I quote here extensively from John Perkins' updated classic, The New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man and show how his … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! The New Confessions…

Evil UNMASKED!! Business Deception

Legion are the ways that evil can manifest but it is always based upon deception. This is why Christ's claim to BE the … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Business Deception

Evil UNMASKED!! Conman & Hypocrite, Paul Bolte

This post gives more details of the history of a highly talented Aussie conman Paul Bolte, currently located in the USA … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Conman & Hypocrite, Paul Bolte

Evil UNMASKED!! Fessing & Speaking Up

In this post, part of a series) I share the process of admitting fault and speaking up about evil. Generally people do … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Fessing & Speaking Up

Evil UNMASKED!! Logical Failure & Cover-ups

If deception is key to evil then identifying logical failures and cover-ups helps us in understanding the godliness of … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Logical Failure & Cover-ups

Evil UNMASKED!! A Living Christ Challenges

In this post I discuss the challenges that a living Jesus brings to those who deny or twist the simple biblical … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! A Living Christ Challenges

Evil UNMASKED!! Escape The Church

This post explains how the organised [Christian] church can be a dangerous place for genuine truth-seekers; not because … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Escape The Church

Evil UNMASKED!! Understanding Global Geopolitics

Hopium, fearmongering, disinformation and human nature make a toxic mix deliberately designed to confuse mere mortals … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Understanding Global Geopolitics

Evil UNMASKED!! Satanic Ritual Abuse & Pedophilia

I define evil as 'anything that falls short of God's desires' but Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) & Pedophilia are widely … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Satanic Ritual Abuse & Pedophilia

Evil UNMASKED!! Stretching the Rules

In this post I use the story of a 'crooked operator' that I have crossed swords with here in Taumarunui, to demonstrate … [Read More...] about Evil UNMASKED!! Stretching the Rules

Recent Comments

  • dennis on Open Letter: Nicholas Veniamin – QFS Ponzi Scheme
  • Harry Booth on Open Letter: Nicholas Veniamin – QFS Ponzi Scheme
  • dennis on Deception – The MH370 & MH17 Stories
  • Tania ROZOWSKIJ on Deception – The MH370 & MH17 Stories
  • dennis on The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Invalid Assumptions
  • Elle on The Crewe Murders UNMASKED!! Invalid Assumptions
  • dennis on PUBLIC WARNING: Charlie Ward & the QFS Ponzi Scheme
  • rachel469 on PUBLIC WARNING: Charlie Ward & the QFS Ponzi Scheme

I Fed The Baby

Media Release – I Fed the Baby – Confession & Motives in the Crewe Murders Cold Case

A book by the late Te Kuiti resident, John Ingley that claims to have solved the Crewe murders, will be available free, … [Read More...] about Media Release – I Fed the Baby – Confession & Motives in the Crewe Murders Cold Case

I Fed the Baby (IFTB)

This is the raw text of the book 'I Fed the Baby - Confession & Motives in theCrewe Murders Cold Case' by John … [Read More...] about I Fed the Baby (IFTB)

IFTB – Preface

The Preface of New Zealand Police CREWE Homicide Review of 2014, written by Detective Superintendent Andrew J Lovelock, … [Read More...] about IFTB – Preface

IFTB – Publisher’s Introduction

The double murder of Harvey & Jeanette Crewe in June of 1970 mesmerised the New Zealand public as the related events … [Read More...] about IFTB – Publisher’s Introduction

IFTB – About the Author

This chapter gives a little of my background, where I grew up and went to school, my hunting skills and what that taught … [Read More...] about IFTB – About the Author

IFTB – 1: Evils of this World

One of the most sensational and documented murder mysteries in New Zealand remains unsolved regardless of an innocent … [Read More...] about IFTB – 1: Evils of this World

IFTB – 2: I Fed the Baby!

Before my eyes I saw her go into hysterics, then she fell to the floor not unlike a person who is having a fit . . . … [Read More...] about IFTB – 2: I Fed the Baby!

IFTB – 3: Searching for the Truth

It was enough to drive any sane person crazy! … [Read More...] about IFTB – 3: Searching for the Truth

IFTB – 4: Chennells Family

Finding an appropriate position in the sand on where todraw the line to find a starting point has been one of themost … [Read More...] about IFTB – 4: Chennells Family

IFTB – 5: Properties Purchased

Newman Chennells arrived in New Zealand from England in 1911 where he had previously been earning a living as a land … [Read More...] about IFTB – 5: Properties Purchased

IFTB – 6: Howard Takes Over

Newman followed his real estate interests in Auckland (and Tuakau) which left an opening for his son Howard to take over … [Read More...] about IFTB – 6: Howard Takes Over

IFTB – 7: Land in England?

On the face of it the last will and testament of Nellie Chennells seemed straight forward, but only if one was not aware … [Read More...] about IFTB – 7: Land in England?

IFTB – 8: Was Nellie in Charge?

Using her birth year of 1873 Nellie Chennells would have been aged around 40 when she arrived in New Zealand and as a … [Read More...] about IFTB – 8: Was Nellie in Charge?

IFTB – 9: Demler Family

The Police initially had Len Demler as their prime suspect. English author David Yallop agreed and wrote that “the man … [Read More...] about IFTB – 9: Demler Family

IFTB – 10: Starting a Family

Len Demler certainly had his hands full. He had also started a family and was raising two daughters; Jeannette Lenore … [Read More...] about IFTB – 10: Starting a Family

IFTB – 11: Humiliation for Len

Life was settling down for Len but it was to be the calm before the storm. The years 1961 and 1962 were full of … [Read More...] about IFTB – 11: Humiliation for Len

IFTB – 12: At the Crossroads

Events were coming to a head between Chennells Estate trustees during the early 1960s with the risk of shady deals being … [Read More...] about IFTB – 12: At the Crossroads

IFTB – 13: Age of Eligibility

Jeannette reached the age of 25 on 6 February 1965 and became eligible for her inheritance of the Chennells Estate of … [Read More...] about IFTB – 13: Age of Eligibility

IFTB – 14: Common Denominator

The reader may have noticed by now that one person seemed to be keeping close tabs (and tight control) on the family’s … [Read More...] about IFTB – 14: Common Denominator

IFTB – 15: False Signatures?

Chapter 24 of Chris Birt’s book The Final Chapter examines the claim that Maisie Demler’s signature on her Last Will and … [Read More...] about IFTB – 15: False Signatures?

IFTB – 16: What about Heather?

Very little has been written about Dianne Heather Demler. What we do know is her birth date of 21 January 1942; she goes … [Read More...] about IFTB – 16: What about Heather?

IFTB – 18: Len gets Anxious

Len Demler was starting to show the pressure he was under and while he could see his future going down the gurgler for … [Read More...] about IFTB – 18: Len gets Anxious

IFTB – 17: The Heat was On

Brief mention has been previously made on the roles played by Maisie’s trustees, particularly Alf Hodgson and Colin … [Read More...] about IFTB – 17: The Heat was On

IFTB – 19: It Didn’t Start Yesterday

Most followers of the Crewe murders were only able to point the finger at ‘whodunnit’ from the information reported in … [Read More...] about IFTB – 19: It Didn’t Start Yesterday

IFTB – 20: Legacy of Greed

Maisie Demler passed away on 26 February 1970 and less than five months later, on 17 June 1970, Jeannette and Harvey … [Read More...] about IFTB – 20: Legacy of Greed

IFTB – 21: Opinion and Failures

The Police never worked out why the Crewes were murdered mainly because they failed to come up with a logical motive. … [Read More...] about IFTB – 21: Opinion and Failures

IFTB – 22: Inventory of Assets

The next major episode in the timeline of the murders revolves around the administration and management of Maisie’s … [Read More...] about IFTB – 22: Inventory of Assets

IFTB – 23: In the Days Before

In an early chapter I said experts worldwide claim that crime comes down to–99 times out of a hundred–love, hate, or … [Read More...] about IFTB – 23: In the Days Before

IFTB – 24: The Days Between

It’s now time to narrow the focus to what happened on 17 June leading up to the brutal double murder and of the events … [Read More...] about IFTB – 24: The Days Between

IFTB – 25: The Aftermath

Had Demler been telling lies and why was he stalling for time during the process of reporting what he had discovered at … [Read More...] about IFTB – 25: The Aftermath

IFTB – 26: Answers Well Hidden

The reason why the bodies of Jeannette and Harvey Crewe were moved from their house created a lot of discussion, … [Read More...] about IFTB – 26: Answers Well Hidden

IFTB – 27: The Murder Scenes

Detailed information covering the various murder scenes is readily available from other sources with resulting evidence … [Read More...] about IFTB – 27: The Murder Scenes

IFTB – 28: Len’s Master Plan

In hindsight, and in general, one can now see the larger side of the pattern in the fight for control of the estates. … [Read More...] about IFTB – 28: Len’s Master Plan

IFTB – 29: Leslee

I mentioned in Chapter Two that Leslee’s confession triggered my investigation into the Crewe murders. It’s no … [Read More...] about IFTB – 29: Leslee

IFTB – 30: Investigation Failures

In 2010 the Minister of Police initiated a Review intothe Police Investigations into the Crewe murders. Afterdigesting … [Read More...] about IFTB – 30: Investigation Failures

IFTB – 31: Whodunnit?

Events relating to Arthur Allan Thomas’ involvement, arrest, legal events and supposed guilt are preposterous and … [Read More...] about IFTB – 31: Whodunnit?

IFTB – Publisher’s conclusions

Understanding the events of Pukekawa in June 1970 cannot be just limited to analysing bullets and working out who ‘made’ … [Read More...] about IFTB – Publisher’s conclusions

Copyright © 2023 Dennis A. Smith · Ph: 09 817-6402 ~ 4/2a Para St, Matapuna, Taumarunui 3920, New Zealand · Disclosure Statement · Contact Details · Club Credits ID: FX693M8 · RSS Feed · Comments Feed · dennis@dennis.nz · Log in