Here I dive into the murky world of law – specifically Crown Solicitors. I explain that while their public appearance is that they are out to protect the public interests and that they work for the public good, it is grossly naive to believe this is the case all the time. Sure they may do this sometimes but when you are on the tail end of their activities it is you who will find yourself facing the state and the state will do whatever it needs to, to win. You MUST forget truth, natural justice, fair play, integrity and everything else that you would expect . . . I have seen firsthand more than once that their one and only goal is to win. If they can look good or fearsome in the process (especially to those that really matter to them) then that’s even better!
It’s tough, and I mean R-E-A-L-L-Y tough to grow up. Santa, the Tooth Fairy, know-it-all (but who actually don’t) parents, the Mainstream news media, politicians, religious leaders, businessmen, greedy ungrateful or gold digging wives or manipulating men all out to profit from you, your labour, love or commitment. It hurts to realise again and again that the truth is a very precious commodity. Watch in 2022 as conspiracy becomes more mainstream and the MSM will be seen more and more as pure falsehood – the real conspiracy. The longer it goes on too, the harder it is to face the fact that we’ve actually been conned. Maturity comes when we accept that this is life – this is the way that things actually ARE.
The Crewe Murders
More than fifty years ago a fruitloop by the name of Len Demler arranged for his daughter and her hubby to get bumped off so he could retain control of the family loot that his now deceased ex had kept from him. All sorts of madness then occurred as greedy, corrupt cops mixed with Autism, violence, threats, dodgy deals, BS and the legal fraternity to hoodwink us all.
Thank God somebody had the wherewithal to get his teeth into it, and thank God another dude had the persistence to write it all up, and thank God another had the proverbial down below to put it all together, say it like it is and then publish. John Ingley, his Editor and I got the job done and the result was the incredibly revealing book I Fed the Baby and my blogging about it since has continued to share truth. Yeah, I know that it hurts to find out how we’ve been hoodwinked all these years, but hey, we’re all going to know it all one day aren’t we?
Tell me please why the eventual recipient of much of the loot in the Crewe murders and her dodgy boyfriend/husband that was hated by the mother-in-law so much that she would rip her family in two over her disgust for him were never put on the stand, ever? Umm, how many people knew or even still know that Heather Crewe’s future husband Bob was an outright crook, an undischarged bankrupt so bad that he got a dishonourable discharge from the US Military? Are we waking up now, people? How much more has been and still is being kept from you? And do you know who the baby Crewe uses for her lawyer? Surely it wouldn’t be a Crown Solicitor from South Auckland would it? Who does SHE work for then as a Crown Solicitor? And who else does she represent, umm actually against one Arthur Allan Thomas and fifty years on FFS! Do your research people and find out who the complainants actually are and you’ll get the picture! I’m not allowed to tell you but more than one person I know knows who they are and why the poor guy has to go through BS like this all over again! Anyone say, “Money? Greed?”
Dodgeeeeey! And please don’t ask me about the dodgy QC who was engaged to vet the Police’s cover-up review into their investigation. Mr “We-don’t-know-the-significance-of-the-missing-evidence-but-something-happened-nonetheless-but-please-don’t-ask-me-or-look-at-that-one-anyone” himself, David Jones, QC!
Look I never lost a court case in 43 years, up until a couple of years ago when one of my companies got pinged for not conducting a taxable activity and could not register for GST, well according to a dopey judge and a ‘dodgy’ Crown Solicitor, anyway! I will never forget the spectacle of a Crown lawyer standing before a judge saying, “Mr Smith is not conducting a taxable activity because he is operating his business from a house-truck!” Yup, a business specifically set up and marketed as a mobile recording studio with a custom-built truck – sound-proof studio, signage and marketing to boot!
I truly could not believe that I was hearing what he was saying but then it twigged and it all made sense, again. These guys don’t believe what they say – they’re lawyers, engaged to win – and for the crown – at any cost. They’ll walk out of that courtroom and rack up another win for the state and bugger the human or personal consequences to the poor little taxpayer. They’ve done their job!
“Hang on . . . Say what?” I hear you ask. “Did you sue the IRD and lose because you could NOT register one of your companies for GST?”
That’s right, possums! The NZ Commissioner of Inland Revenue issued a ruling way back when that my company was not conducting a taxable activity and therefore could not register for GST! I tried to register, indeed I DID register, pay and charge GST, but the ruling came down against me, well my company actually. Nope! Not conducting a taxable activity – can’t claim GST.
Spare me days are these fools on the same page as me or what? I thought they wanted to collect as much tax as they could?
Nope! Not when Crown Law gets involved at least.
And you know why you haven’t heard about it? Well the TRA has made a ruling that I can’t blog about it nor identify the taxable entity involved. I still haven’t directly, have I? Secret by order of the court, despite me asking to identify myself! Bah! BS & Bunkum!
As an aside I also heard the same from a senior tax man that visited my aging father and me in Titirangi too . . . showing him the financial details of 499 companies (to the cent BTW) all who had conducted tax fraud – between $6.9m and $7.5m proven (depending on your ledger valuation methods) of trading actually and the IRD simply wasn’t interested.
“Dennis” the tax inspector said matter of factly, “The IRD has four sectors that we know serious tax evasion is occurring. If we somehow doubled our staff and resources overnight we couldn’t even touch this all!”
Shocked at this response, I mean after all don’t the IRD encourage the little guys to pay their fair share and to dob in those that don’t? I countered with a stupid (in hindsight) comment, “But it’s illegal, David!”
David, that was the name of the IRD senior inspector, looked over and put me in my place with, “Dennis, the law is broken every day!”
Saying, “STFU, go away and leave us alone so that we can do our work, will you please?” would have been a lot less painful . . .
So that’s two dodgy Crown Solicitors if you ask me. Thank you for asking. Surely the rot is not systemic though is it? Isn’t there one Crown Solicitor that you can trust, who cares, who shows integrity in whom you can trust Dennis? Surely?
Look I promise . . . I can be an absolute professional arsehole and I tell people exactly that but I’m always fair. One mate of mine says that I am a C*** (because that’s just the way that he talks) to which he rapidly changes to the other side of the body when I start to correct him. “Yes, yes, I know,” he says as he notes my tenacity in vulgar terms. I never give up and this pisses people off especially when they lie and deceive and ESPECIALLY when they try to do this against me or the little guys that I stand up for.
Jacs Hamilton, Hamilton’s ‘Dodgy’ Crown Solicitor
So my recent run-in with the law seems to have flushed out some crooks in power, one of them who is part of a gender and professional clique that is VERY concerned about her appearance and really should know a lot better. In a Memorandum issued to a District Court Judge who last year acquitted me of the criminal charge of “Obtaining by Deception” I claimed that the Hamilton Crown Solicitor deceived the court. I use the word deception deliberately because this can be innocent or deliberate (the former may be simply an accident or if deliberate then this is a crime). Here is a summary of my claims issued to her law firm earlier today:
I understand from Tracey or Tracy that Jacinda will be back on deck next Monday.
If Jacinda is checking in in the meantime can you please ask her to call me to discuss the Memorandum I sent to the court earlier this year (cc you) and my proposed actions.
Respectfully it seems to me that it is in Jacinda’s interest to initiate meaningful communications with me directly as it is my intention to continue the public exposure of these matters, some of which have the potential to negatively impact on HL’s reputation. If I was in her position I would want to know in advance of what was about to go down.
Essentially it is my claim that:
- Jacinda has not spoken to me ever and that this was deliberate, i.e. by her conscious design;
- That on the same day that I issued the 15 questions she spoke with David Grey Police Prosecutor in Taumarunui;
- During that discussion it was determined that Crown Law would withdraw the charges;
- During that discussion it is also my allegation that partial and/or incorrect information was passed to her sufficient to encourage her to make false (or at least contested) statements of fact to me and to the court;
- A minimum of one of the third parties associated with this matter was advised of this decision prior to the Crown advising me and that they were advised to keep this intention secret from me;
- She stated a falsehood to the Court that she had “reviewed the file” when she had not done this, instead taking her entire feed from a ‘dodgy’ source with a vested interest in hurting me (David Grey); and
- There is a possibility (my analysis here is subject to court confirmation) that she has deceived the Court by saying that this letter to me was attached when it wasn’t.
Can you please forward this email to Jacinda and advise me when done.Thanks
Lianna did this thanks Lianna
What has happened here is yet to be acknowledged and proven but it is clear to me that something dirty has gone down on her watch. There are way too many coincidences and using the plausible deniability card doesn’t wash with it all. Jacs has lied to the court stating that she has reviewed the file. She didn’t. She took a feed from a dude that I simply embarrassed, twice, who has it in for me. She has also told the court that the goods have been returned to the rightful owner. Umm, who says, honey? You? The Judge? The Complainant or the really embarrassed Police Prosecutor in Taumarunui that I’ve caught out twice and who therefore has it in for me? How about we take the matter to court and determine who rightfully owns the steel shall we? Like I have tried to do before you got involved?
My take is that everybody lies – everybody, especially when they think that they can get away with it and especially when they have a lot to lose, like Jacs. IMHO she has made some big mistakes. It will be big of her to fess up and do the honourable thing. Personally I reckon that she should hammer the David Grey fella for setting her up. Any judge can understand a busy Crown Solicitor telling the odd porkie or white lie in the interests of just getting the job done, but twisting the truth like David has clearly done should mean he gets fired if not charged.
I’m actually ambivalent as to how this whole thing shakes down especially with lawyers because they think they are too smart that they can’t be caught – that is before they meet their match with a dude like me who has nothing to lose and comes after them. Also, most fools dig deeper when they are in a hole, doubling down on an empty hand. We’ll see how this Crown Solicitor deals with it all over the next little while and I’ll keep you informed for sure.
The point here for most of us, is that not all who say that they are clean actually are. You have to go into a new situation assuming goodwill and then the moment that you can see bad faith, you gotta get ready to walk or settle in for a long haul battle. Remember that most people are NOT driven by principle. Pragmatics rule in the current age.
Let’s go back to the introduction then and review what I said at the outset:
… while their public appearance is that they are out to protect the public interests and that they work for the public good, it is grossly naive to believe this is the case all the time. Sure they may do this sometimes but when you are on the tail end of their activities it is you who will find yourself facing the state and the state will do whatever it needs to, to win. You MUST forget truth, natural justice, fair play, integrity and everything else that you would expect . . . I have seen firsthand more than once that their one and only goal is to win. If they can look good or fearsome in the process (especially to those that really matter to them) then that’s even better!